Tereza Krejcova vs Marie Villet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing second serve performance over the past six months reveals Villet has secured points at a rate of 35.14% on their second serve, whereas Krejcova demonstrates a more robust performance with 43.33%. This metric is notably significant in enhancing the accuracy of match outcome predictions, thus holding substantial weight in forecasting the likely victor.

In examining return game statistics, Villet has outperformed in several areas, including winning an impressive 48.32% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Krejcova has achieved 43.48% in the same category. Furthermore, Villet maintains an upper hand in first serve return points at 36.75% against Krejcova's 26.75%. These figures strongly align with determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, Villet appears more adept at saving breakpoints, accomplishing a 46.85% save rate compared to Krejcova's 39.39%. Such resilience is a critical factor for in-game betting predictions. Additionally, Villet’s overall performance over the last year outshines Krejcova's, with Villet winning 52.46% of matches played, indicated by a 32/29 win-loss record, whereas Krejcova records a mere 16.67% with a 1/5 win-loss ratio.

On evaluating surfaces, Villet is most proficient on Hard courts, boasting a 52% win record from a 145/136 win-loss ratio. Conversely, Krejcova’s best surface performance occurs on Indoor Hard, albeit at a modest 25% (1/3). Their poorest record lies on Hard courts at 0% (0/1). This versatility across different surfaces further tilts the prediction in favor of Villet.

In terms of tournament levels, Villet has concentrated their participation predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, achieving a 55.81% win rate (24/19), while Krejcova has competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, unfortunately, unable to secure a win (0/4). The event level comparison emphasizes Villet's upper hand in adapting to various competitive scenarios.

The quality of opponents further underscores Villet's advantage, as they faced adversaries with an average rank of 370.23 over the last year, compared to Krejcova's opponents who averaged at 458.67. If the match progresses into a deciding set, statistics show Villlet winning 46% of these encounters compared to Krejcova's 33% success rate.

Break point conversion rates are also competitive with Villet converting 43.27% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Krejcova’s conversion rate of 42.86%. This aspect provides insights for favorable in-game betting outcomes when either player is on the brink of breaking serve.

On scrutinizing these statistics and comparisons, the forecast tilts considerably towards Villet as the favored contender. Their robust stats across important areas suggest a higher likelihood of emerging victorious in the upcoming tennis match against Krejcova.